"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>We follow a systematic and structured process for collecting course feedback at the end of every semester. The feedback questionnaire is designed with questions mapped to the defined Course Outcomes (COs). Thus, the feedback serves a dual purpose: it evaluates teaching effectiveness and also contributes to the assessment of course attainment through an indirect assessment method.<\/p>\n<p>The Course Attainment Model incorporates both direct and indirect assessment components. Direct attainment, based on students&rsquo; performance in examinations and internal assessments, carries a weightage of 70%, while indirect attainment, derived from structured student feedback, contributes 30% to the overall course attainment.<\/p>\n<p>Student responses are collected on five performance parameters: <strong>Excellent, Very Good, Good, Average, and Poor<\/strong>. For attainment calculation, only responses rated <strong>Good and above<\/strong> are considered. Based on this criterion, the percentage attainment is computed for each course.<\/p>\n<p>The average feedback-based attainment percentages are as follows:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Urban Planning<\/strong> &ndash; 94.74%<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Infrastructure &amp; Transportation Systems<\/strong> &ndash; 92.16%<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Infrastructure Engineering<\/strong> &ndash; 93.67%<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Building Planning &amp; Design<\/strong> &ndash; 93.27%<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Construction Quality Control &amp; Safety<\/strong> &ndash; 97.84%<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<p><strong>Human Resource Management<\/strong> &ndash; 96.29%<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The consistently high attainment percentages reflect strong student satisfaction and effective outcome-based course delivery across semesters.<\/p>"